Chemical |
Acrylonitrile |
CAS-number : |
107-13-1 |
|
Synonyms : |
2-propeeninitriili |
2-propenenitrile |
acrylon |
Akrylonitriili |
cyanoethylene |
vinylcyanide. |
|
Sumformula of the chemical : |
CH2=CHCN
C3H3N |
EINECS-number : |
2034665 |
|
Uses : |
Solvent.
The major use of acrylonitrile is in the production
of acrylic and modacrylic fibres by copolymerization with
methylacrylate, methylmethacrylate, vinylacetate,
vinylchloride, or vinylidenechloride.
Other major uses include
the manufacture of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) and
styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN) resins.
Acrylonitrile is also used
as a fumigant.
|
|
State and appearance : |
Colourless liquid.
|
|
Odor : |
Characteristic.
Quality: onion, garlic.
Hedonic tone: pungent
Threshold Odour Concentration: recognition: 3.72 -51.0 mg/m3
1.7 - 23 ppm
Population Identification Threshold (50 %): 21.4 ppm
Population Identification Threshold (100 %): 21.4 ppm
average: 18.6 ppm
number of panellists: 16
41.9 mg/m3 = 19 ppm
45 mg/m3 = 20.4 ppm
detection: 3.4 mg/m3
recognition: 47 mg/m3 (Verschueren 1983).
Practically odorless or with a very slight odor of peach
kernels (HSDB 2001).
|
|
Molecular weight : |
53.06 |
|
Spesicif gravity (water=1) : |
0.8004 |
at 25 °C |
|
Vapor density (air=1) : |
1.83 |
|
|
Conversion factor, 1 ppm in air=_mg/m3 : |
2.203 |
mg/m3 |
|
Conversion factor, 1 mg/m3 in air=_ppm : |
0.454 |
ppm |
|
Vapor pressure, mmHg : |
100 |
at 23°C |
60 |
at 11.8°C, MITI 1992 |
107.8 |
at 25 °C, Daubert & Danner 1985 |
83 |
at 20 °C, OVA 1999 |
330 |
at 55 °C, OHM/TADS 2001 |
|
Water solubility, mg/l : |
70000 |
|
73500 |
at 20 °C |
82000 |
MITI 1992 |
75000 |
at 25 °C, Valvani 1981 |
|
Melting point, °C : |
-83 |
|
-83 |
MITI 1992 |
|
Boiling point, °C : |
77.4 |
|
77.3 |
MITI 1992 |
|
Log octanol/water coefficient, log Pow : |
0.3 |
Yoshioka et al. 1986 |
0.25 |
Sangster 1989 |
0.25 |
Hansch & Leo 1985 |
0.12 |
OVA 1999 |
0.21 |
LOGKOW 1994 |
|
Henry's law constant, Pa x m3/mol : |
11.145 |
at 25 °C, Bocek 1976 |
13.98 |
est. from the structure, HSDB 2001 |
|
Volatilization : |
Relative volatility (nBuAc=1) = 6.33
The overall transfer coefficient for acrylonitrile relative to
oxygen is 0.59.
Coupled with the reaeration rates for oxygen in
typical bodies of water, one can estimate that the
volatilization half-life of acrylonitrile in a typical pond,
river and lake are 6, 1.1 and 4.8 days, respectively.
Acrylonitrile is highly volatile and not strongly adsorped to
soil and will therefore volatilize rapidly from soil and other
surfaces.
The Henry's Law constant for acrylonitrile estimated
from the structure is 1.38X10-4 atm-cm3/mole.
Using this
Henry's Law constant, the volatilization half-life from a model
river flowing i m/sec with a 3 m/sec wind and 1 m depth in 6.8
hours (HSDB 2001).
|
|
Adsorption/desorption : |
The Koc for acrylonitrile calculated from the water solubility
is 9 indicating that adsorption to soil will be insignificant
(HSDB 2001).
|
|
Photochemical degradation in air : |
Photooxidation by ultraviolet light in aqueous medium at 50 °C:
24.2 % degradation to CO2 after 24 hours (Verschueren 1983).
Acrylonitrile does not absorb light >290 nm and is therefore
not susceptible to direct photolysis (Grasselli & Ritchey 1975).
Acrylonitrile reacts with photochemically produced hydroxyl
radicals with a reaction half-life of 3.5 days (assuming 12 hr
of sunlight) (Edney et al. 1983).
Reaction with ozone is not fast enough to be a significant
sink (Harris et al. 1981)
In a smog chamber, the formation of ozone is significant with
the time to maximum ozone formation averaging 5.3 times faster
than propane in five experiments and 5.3%/hr of acrylonitrile
disappeared (Dimitriades & Joshi 1977) (Sickles et al. 1980).
For a first-order reaction, this is equivalent to a half-life of
13 hr.
Formaldehyde and PAN-type compounds are formed
(Spicer et al. 1985).
Photooxidation half-life in air:
8.25d - 13.4hr, based upon measured rate constant for reaction
with hydroxyl radical in air (Howard 1991).
The photolysis of acrylonitrile vapor at 213.9 nm was shown to
proceed via two molecular elimination pathways, one yielding
acetylene and hydrogen cyanide and the other yielding
cyanoacetylene and hydrogen.
The quantum yields for the two
processes were determined to be 0.50 and 0.31, respectively.
In
the presence of such photosensitizers as xanthene,
triphenylene, bentzophenone, acetophenone, fluorenone and
dibromoanthracene, the major product of photolysis of
acrylonitrile in solution was shown to be
1,2-dicyanocyclobutane.
Teh dicyanocyclobutane is not very
stable, however and it is unlikely that the reaction will
proceed in the gas phase (HSDB 2001).
It has showed that the reaction of acrylonitrile with hydroxyl
radicals was independent of temperature in the range studied
but showed a small increase with increasing pressure (Risk
Assessment 1998).
|
|
Photochemical degradation in water : |
Photooxidation by ultra violet light in aqueous medium (50 C):
24.2 % degradation to CO2 after 24 hours (Verschueren 1983).
|
|
Hydrolysis in water : |
Acrylonitrile (10 ppm) was stable at pH 4 to 10 for 23 days
indicating that hydrolysis is negligible under these
conditions (Going et al. 1979).
First-order hydrolysis half-life: 1.06X10 7 hr (1210yr)
(t1/2 at pH 7.0) Based upon measured acid and base
catalyzed hydrolysis rate constants (Howard 1991).
|
|
Hydrolysis in acid : |
Acid rate constant (M(H+)-hr)-1: 4.2X10-2 M-1 hr-1
(t1/2 = 1.65X10 6 hr (188 years) at pH 5.0) Based upon measured
acid and base catalyzed hydrolysis rate constants (Howard
1991).
|
|
Hydrolysis in base : |
Base rate constant (M(OH-)-hr)-1: 6.1X10-1 M-1 hr-1
(t1/2=1.14X10 5 hr (13 years) at pH 9.0) Based upon measured
acid and base catalyzed hydrolysis rate constants (Howard
1991).
|
|
Half-life in air, days : |
8.25 |
8.25d - 13.4hr, |
0.56 |
based upon photooxidation half-life in air. |
|
Howard 1991 |
|
Half-life in soil, days : |
23 |
23d - 30hr, |
1.25 |
scientific judgement based upon estimated aqueous aerobic biodegradation half-life. |
|
Howard 1991 |
|
Half-life in water, days : |
23 |
23d - 30hr, |
1.25 |
in surface water: scientific judgement based upon estimated aqueous aerobic biodegradation half-life. |
46 |
46d - 2.5d, |
2.5 |
in ground water: scientific judgement based upon estimated aqueous aerobic biodegradation half-life. |
|
Howard 1991 |
|
Aerobic degradation in water : |
In studies using activated sludge inocula >95% degradation, 70%
of theoretical BOD removal was reported after 21 days
acclimation in a screening study; 30% of theoretical BOD
removal was reported after 10 days in a treatment plant; and
>99% degradation, 30% of theoretical BOD removal was reported
in a bench-scale continuous flow reactor (Stover & Kincannon
1983) (Howard 1989).
It has reported 0 and 38% of theoretical BOD removal after 5
and 20 days, respectively, and complete degradation in 7 days
in screening studies with sewage seed (Young et al. 1968)
(Tabak et al. 1981).
Acrylonitrile completely degraded in Missisippi river water in 6
days (Going et al. 1979).
Aerobic half-life:
23d - 30hr, scientific judgement based upon river die-away
testa data (Howard 1991).
|
|
Anaerobic degradation in water : |
Under anaerobic conditions acrylonitrile was poorly degraded in
a reactor with a 2 - 10 day retention time, with only 17%
utilization being reported after 110 days acclimation (Chou
1979).
Anaerobic half-life:
92d - 5d, scientific judgement based upon estimated aqueous
aerobic biodegradation half-life (Howard 1991).
|
|
Total degradation in soil : |
Aerobic biodegradation of acrylonitrile was evaluated in soil
samples at concentrations between 10 and 1000 ppm.
In a Londo
soil, complete degradation occurred in less than 2 days fot
concentrations uo to 100 ppm.
Acrylamide and acrylic acid were
observed as transient intermediates of the degradation process.
The slowness of the degradation process at higher
concentrations was probably due to inhibitory effects of the
initial acrylonitrile (HAZARDTEXT 2001).
|
|
Total degradation in water : |
Biodegradation:
41-74% by BOD
period: 14d
substance: 30 mg/l
sludge: 100 mg/l
(MITI 1992)
The biodegradation of acrylonitrile is reported to occur
readily at concentrations less than 20 mg/l during anaerobic
digestion processes operated in multicipal sewage treatment
facilities.
Is has been observed that a Pseudomonas-containing
sludge used for the treatment of industrial acrylonitrile
wastes, could degrade up to 35 % of the pollutant at
concentration levels of 500 mg/l (HSDB 2001).
Microbial activity can reduce initial concn. of 10, 25 and 50
ppm.
The two lower concentrations supporting mixed microbes and
the higher concn favoring fungi (HSDB 2001).
150 mg/l of acrylonitrile can be utilized by saprophytic
microorganisms.
At concn above 50 ppm acrylonitrile may inhibit
bacterial nitrification, affecting activated sludge processes
(HSDB 2001).
Method Experimental details Result
OECD 301 D 2 mg/l acrylonitrile, effluent 0% degr. 28 d
from laboratory waste water
treatment plant
OECD 301 C 100 mg/l acrylonitrile and 14.7% degr. 28 d
30 mg/l suspended solids
OECD 302 C 30 mg/l acrylonitrile and 41-74% degr. 28 d
100 mg/l suspended solids
(Risk Assessment 1998).
|
|
Other information of degradation : |
Biodegradation by mutant microorganisms (Verschueren 1983)
- 500 mg/l at 20 C disruption:
mutant 100 % in 4 hours
Impact on biodegradation processes: BOD test is not influenced
up to 1 g/l (Verschueren 1983).
At 100 mg/l no inhibition of NH3 oxidation by Nitrosomonas sp
(Verschueren 1983).
|
|
Other information of bioaccumulation : |
The whole body bioconcentration factor for a bluegill exposed
to acrylonitrile for 28 days, or until equilibrium was obtained
in a flowing water system, was 48 (Barraws et al. 1978).
The bioconcentration factor estimated from the water solubility
is 1 (Kenaga 1980).
|
|
LD50 values to mammals in oral exposure, mg/kg : |
82 |
orl-rat,Lewis & Sweet 1984 |
|
-- |
35 |
orl-mus, Verschueren 1983 |
78 |
orl-rat, Verschueren 1983 |
90 |
orl-gpg, Verschueren 1983 |
|
LD50 values to mammals in non-oral exposure , mg/kg : |
148 |
skn-rat,Lewis & Sweet 1984 |
250 |
skn-rbt |
|
Other information of mammals : |
Rat inhalation: slight transitory effect: 129 ppm
Rat inhalation: fatal: 636 ppm, 4 hours
Rabbit inhalation: slight transitory effect: 97 ppm
Rabbit inhalation: fatal: 258 ppm
Cat inhalation: sometimes fatal: 152 ppm
Guinea pig inhalation: slight transitory effect: 267 ppm
Dog inhalation: very slight effects: 29 ppm
Dog inhalation: 3/4: 110 ppm
Rats: ingestion: 35 ppm (4 mg/kg body weight /day): mild signs
of toxicity (decreased water and food consumption, decreased
body weight).
100 ppm (10 mg/kg body weight /day) during 12
months: stomach papillomas (1 of 20 rats); central nervous
system tumors (6 of 20 rats).
Zymbal gland carcinoma (2 of 20 rats).
Rats: inhalation: 80 ppm (6 hr/day, 5 days/week, 1 year): 3 of
26 rats; central nervous system tumors.
(Verschueren 1983).
|
|
Effects on microorganisms : |
Pseudomonas putida: inhibition of cell multiplication starts at
53 mg/l (Verschueren 1983).
|
|
EC50 values to algae, mg/l : |
3.1 |
72 hr, biomass, Scenedesmus subspicatus |
7.1 |
> 7.1 mg/l, 72 hr, growth rate, Scenedesmus subspicatus |
1.64 |
72 hr, biomass, Skeletonema costatum |
14.1 |
72 hr, growth rate, Skeletomena costatum |
|
Risk Assessment 1998 |
|
LOEC values to algae, mg/l : |
1 |
calc. Scenedesmus subspicatus, Risk Assessment 1998 |
|
NOEC values to algae, mg/l : |
0.8 |
calc. biomass, Scenedesmus subspicatus |
0.41 |
biomass, Skeletonema costatum |
3 |
growth rate, Skeletonema costatum |
|
Risk Assessment 1998 |
|
LC50 values to crustaceans, mg/l : |
6 |
96 hr,Crangon crangon,Adema 1976 |
|
-- |
7.6 |
48 hr, Daphnia magna,LeBlanc 1980 |
|
-- |
6.2 |
6.2 - 9.2 mg/l, 48 hr, Daphnia magna |
9.2 |
AQUIRE 2001 |
|
EC50 values to crustaceans, mg/l : |
9.5 |
9.5 - 11.0 mg/l, 48 hr, Daphnia magna |
11 |
|
12.6 |
12.6 - 14.1 mg/l, 48 hr, Artemia salina |
14.1 |
|
10 |
10 - 33 mg/l, 24 hr, Crangon crangon |
33 |
AQUIRE 2001 |
|
-- |
8.7 |
8.7 - 10.0 mg/l, 48 hr, Daphnia magna |
10 |
|
16.9 |
96 hr, Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri |
14.21 |
48 hr, Chironomus sp. |
14.34 |
48 hr, Artemia salina |
40 |
48 hr, Radix pliculata |
20 |
48 hr, Crangon crangon |
|
Risk Assessment 1998 |
|
LOEC values to crustaceans, mg/l : |
1 |
21 d, rpd, Daphnia magna, AQUIRE 2001 |
|
NOEC values to crustaceans, mg/l : |
0.5 |
21 d, rpd, Daphnia magna, AQUIRE 2001 |
0.78 |
48 hr, Daphnia magna, Risk Assessment 1998 |
|
LC50 values to fishes, mg/l : |
11.6 |
96 hr,Lepomis macrochirus,Jones 1971 |
14.3 |
96 hr,Pimephales promelas |
33.5 |
96 hr,Poelicia reticulata |
|
-- |
32 |
48 hr, Oryzias latipes |
|
Tonogai et al. 1982 |
|
-- |
25 |
96 hr,Branchydanio rerio,Wellens 1982 |
13 |
13 - 28 mg/l,48 hr, Leuciscus idus |
28 |
|
|
-- |
24.5 |
24 hr, Lagodon rhomboides |
24 |
48 hr,Pimephales promelas |
14 |
96hr, Gobius minutus, in sea water, 15 °C, |
|
Verschueren 1983 |
|
-- |
28 |
48 hr, Leuciscus idus |
13 |
48 hr, Leuciscus idus melanotus |
18.1 |
18.1 - 21.4 mg/l, 96 hr, Cyprinus carpio |
21.4 |
|
8 |
8.0 - 24.4 mg/l, 96 hr, Lepomis macrochirus |
24.4 |
|
56 |
48 hr, Orcornhynchus mykiss |
32 |
48 hr, Oryzias latipes |
6.7 |
6.7 - 39 mg/l, 96 hr, Pimephales promelas |
39 |
|
33.5 |
96 hr, Poetica reticulata |
|
AQUIRE 2001 |
|
-- |
11.8 |
96 hr, Lepomis macrochirus |
10.1 |
96 hr, Pimephales promelas |
2.6 |
30 d, Pimephales promelas |
|
HSDB 2001 |
|
-- |
8.6 |
96 hr, Cyprinodon variegatus |
10 |
10 - 11.8 mg/l, 96 hr, Lepomis macrochirus |
11.8 |
|
19.64 |
96 hr, Cyprinus carpio |
5.16 |
96 hr, Ctenophayngodon idellus |
14 |
96 hr, Gobius minutus |
33.5 |
96 hr, Lebistes reticulatus |
2.6 |
30 d, Pimephales promelas |
2.2 |
30 d, Oncorhynchus mykiss |
|
Risk Assessment 1998 |
|
NOEC values to fishes, mg/l : |
5.6 |
96 hr, Cyprinodon variegatus, Risk Assessment 1998 |
References |
13 | Adema, D.M.M., 1976.
Acute toxiciteitstoetsen met
1,2-dichloorethaan, fenol, acrylonitrile, en
alkylbenzenesulfonaat in zeewater.
Central laboratory TNO, 97
Schoemakerstraat-P.O.
Box 217, Delft, The Netherlands. |
3107 | AQUIRE 1993 -.
Aquatic Toxity Information Retrieval Database.
U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticides and
Toxic Substances, Washington, D.C.
|
3141 | Barrows, M.
E. et al. 1978.
Am.
Chem.
Soc.
Div.
Environ.
Chem.
18: 345 - 6.
|
3019 | Bocek, K. 1976.
Experientia Suppl 23: 231 - 240.
|
3142 | Cadena, F. et al. 1984.
J.
Water Pollut.
Control Fed. 56:
460 - 3.
|
2969 | Chou W.
L. et al. 1979.
Biotechnol.
Bioeng.
Symp. 8: 391 - 414. |
2994 | Daubert, T.
E. and Danner, R.
P. 1985.
Data Compilation Tables
of Properties of Pure Compounds. pp 450.
American Institute of
Chemical Engineers.
|
3143 | Dimitriades, B. & Joshi, S.
B. 1977. in Inter.
Conf. on
Photochem.
Oxidant Pollut. and its Control Dimitriades Bed.
USEPA-600/3-77-001B. pp 705 - 11.
|
3125 | Edney, E. et al. 1983.
Atmospheric Chemistry of Several Toxic
Compounds.
USEPA-600/53-82-092.
|
3144 | Going, J. et al. 1979.
Environ.
Monitoring Near Industrial
Sites Acrylonitrile.
USEPA-560/6-79-003.
|
3145 | Grasselli, J. & Ritchey, W. 1975.
Atlas of Spectral Data and
Physical Constants for Organic Compounds 2nd ed Vol 6 The
chemical Rubber Co.
|
2958 | Hansch, C and Leo, A.
J. 1985.
Medchem Project Issue No 26.
Claremont C.A.
Pomona College. |
3149 | Harris, G.
W. et al. 1981.
Chem.
Phys.
Lett. 80: 479 - 83.
|
3047 | Howard, P.
H. 1989.
Handbook of Environmental Fate and
Exposure Data for Organic Chemicals.
Vol.
I: Large Production
and Priority Pollutants.
Lewis Publishers, Inc.
Chelsea. pp 574.
|
3120 | Howard, P.H., Boethling, R.S., Jarvis, W.F., Meylan, W.M. &
Michalenko, E.M., Handbook of Environmental Degradation Rates,
1991.
Lewis Publicers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan, U.S.A.,
pp. 725.
|
3114 | HSDB Database 1992 -.
Hazardous Substances Data Bank.
US.
National Library of Medicine.
TOMES Plus CD-ROM.
|
675 | Jones, H.R. 1971.
Environmental control in the organic and
petrochemical industries.
Noyes Data Corporation 1971. |
2626 | Kenaga, E.
E. 1980.
Ecotoxical.
Environ.
Safety 4: 26 - 38.
|
798 | LeBlanc, G.A. 1980.
Acute toxicity of priority pollutants
to water flea (Daphnia magna).
Bull.
Environm.
Contam.
Toxicol. 24: 684 - 691. |
1589 | Lewis, R.J. & Sweet, D.V. 1984.
Registry of toxic effects of
chemical substances.
National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health.
No. 83-107-4. |
2960 | Lyman, W.
J. et al. 1982.
Handbook of Chemical Property
Estimation Methods.
Environmental behavior of organic
compounds.
McGraw-Hill New York. |
3105 | MITI 1992.
Biodegradation and bioaccumulation data of existing
chemicals based on the CSCL Japan.
Compild under the Safety
Division Basic Industries Bureau Ministry of International
Trade & Industry, Japan.
Edited by Chemicals Inspection &
Testing Institute, Japan.
|
3340 | OVA 1999.
The safety instructions for some hazardous chemicals.
(available in Finnish)/Onnettomuuden vaaraa aiheuttavat
aineet -turvallisuusohjeet (OVA-ohjeet).
Työterveyslaitos
(Finnish Institute of Occupational Health),Työsuojelurahasto
(The Finnish Work Environment Fund).
Helsinki.
Finland.
|
3342 | Risk Assessment of Acrylonitrile, Revised draft, July 1998.
|
3104 | Sangster, J. 1989.
Octanol-water partition coefficients of
simple organic compounds.
J.
Phys.
Chem.
Ref.
Data, Vol 18, No.
3: 1111 - 1229. |
3146 | Sickles, J.
E.
II et al. 1980.
Proc.
Annu.
Meet.
Air Pollut.
Control Assoc. 73rd Paper 80 - 50.1.
|
3147 | Spicer, C.
W. et al. 1985.
Atmospheric Reaction Products from
Hazardous Air Pollut.
Degradation.
USEPA-600/S3-85-028 pp 4.
|
3124 | Stover, E.
L. & Kincannon, D.
F. 1983.
J.
Water Poll.
Control
Fed. 55: 97 - 109.
|
2335 | Tabak, H.H., Quave, S.A., Mashni, C.I. & Barth, E.F. 1981.
Biodegradability studies with organic priority pollutant
compounds.
Journal WPCF. 53: 1503 - 1518.
|
1426 | Tonogai, Y. et al. 1982.
Actual survey of TLm (Median
Tolerance Limit) values of environmental pollutants,
especially on amines, nitriles, aromatic nitrogen compounds and
artificial dyes.
J.
Toxicol.
Sci. 7: 193. |
3014 | Valvani, S.
C. et al. 1981.
J.
Pharm.
Sci 70: 502 - 507.
|
1468 | Verschueren, K. 1983.
Handbook of environmental data of
organic chemicals.
Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
Inc., New York.
1310 s. |
1531 | Wellens, H. 1982.
Comparison of the sensitivity of
Branchydanio rerio and Leucistus idus by testing the fish
toxicity of chemicals and wastewaters.
Z.
Wasser Abwasser
Forsch.
(Ger.) 15: 49. |
2279 | Yoshioka, Y., Mizuno, T., Ose.
Y. & Sato, T. 1986a.
The
estimation for toxicity of chemicals on fish by
physico-chemical properties.
Chemosphere 15 (2): 195 - 203. |
3148 | Young, R.
H.
F. et al. 1968.
J.
Water Pollut.
Control Fed. 40:
354 - 68.
|